Current Issue
Current Issue Cover
Challenging the Academy
May 2010
Content of Current Issue
Class Warriors
William Ayers
Professor William Ayers, banned last year from speaking at the University of Nebraska, argues that the current trend towards “academic capitalism” gives faculty the moment to speak up – and act up. MORE>
Higher Education or Education for Hire? Corporatization and the Threat to Democratic Thinking
Joel Westheimer
Teaching critical thinking is the university’s democratic mission, argues the University of Ottawa’s Joel Westheimer, and today’s universities are failing to deliver. Universities need to reverse the trend that has them focusing on workforce preparation and the commercialization of knowledge and resurrect higher education’s public purpose.  MORE>
The University: Punctuated by Paradox
Simon Marginson
Old/new, engaged/separate, public/private, elite/mass-oriented, national/global. But for universities, Simon Marginson argues, paradox is vital.  MORE>
The Queer Agenda on Campus: Invisible? Stalled? Incomplete?
David Rayside
For universities to become truly inclusive, sexual orientation and gender identity have to be fully incorporated into the employment equity agenda, argues the University of Toronto’s David Rayside. MORE>
Acting Out of Character in the Immortal Profession: Toward a Free Trait Agreement
Brian R. Little
Sometimes, the academic life demands that faculty deny their fundamental personality traits. But if collegial respect includes allowing colleagues the latitude to nurture their true characters, academics can survive and thrive amidst the challenges of academic life. MORE>
An Academic Life: Peter Dale Scott
David MacGregor
 MORE>
Humour Matters – Sabbatical Time
Steve Penfold
In an odd and unpredictable way, the Olympics saved my first sabbatical. I mean, I had great plans for my first sabbatical. No lectures to churn out, no essays to mark, no exams to set, no emails to return – just time to think, read, and write. But it wasn’t going to be all work. No sir. I figured it would be long lunches, real coffee breaks (you know, where you actually take a break!), walks in the afternoon, and even the occasional nap. Sabbatical would be like an adult version of daycare and, if anything went wrong, I could just go to the quiet area for a time out. MORE>
Editorial Matters – The road ahead
Mark Rosenfeld
A university cancels a public lecture by an outspoken academic due to political pressure. A job offer at a prestigious research institute is rescinded in response to the opposition of a large, corporate sponsor. Police arrest demonstrators at a debate on one the flashpoints of regional geo-politics. A decision with far-reaching academic implications is taken with only perfunctory reference to collegial governance. A university’s strategic plan uses the corporate sector as a model, with the aim of maximizing growth, marketability and profit. MORE>
Blogs
emailEmail this article PrintPrint this commentPost a Comment (0) Comments Share/Save/Bookmark
Postcards from the [L]edge: The working life of sessionals and postdocs
by MK and Katherine Akers

Postdocs: Where are we?
by: Katherine Akers
posted on: 1/31/2010
 

The path I took to my current position as a postdoctoral research fellow in Toronto was straightforward.  Four years at university in Missouri, nearly six years in graduate school in New Mexico, and now I am here. But where is “here”, exactly? What is it like to be a postdoc in Canada today?

The Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars (CAPS) sizes it up rather dismally: “ . . . the current diffuse organization of postdoctoral training leaves this class of highly qualified personnel in an especially vulnerable position. Not graduate students, not faculty members, postdocs have so far slipped between the cracks of the recognized workforce of the scientific community and represent a heterogeneous group of poorly defined ‘apprentice’ scientists. As such, postdocs generally do not have well defined expectations of employment, appropriate employment rights and responsibilities, commensurate or even normalized pay scales, performance evaluations, employment benefits such as proper health care, pensions, occupational health insurance, or procedures for resolving conflict. To date, the treatment of postdocs within Canada is inconsistent at best, and largely ignored at worst.”

Yikes. That doesn’t sound so good, does it? Of course, a postdoc is intended to be a temporary position. So if you can get out quickly, it’s not too bad, right? And, indeed, I’ve known a few people who have been able to get jobs after being a postdoc for only a year or two. But I’ve known far more people who end up being a postdoc for longer than they expected due to a myriad of reasons (high competition for jobs, family circumstances, geographical restrictions, indecision on what to do next, etc.). Regardless of how long one stays in a postdoc position, the facts of the matter are the same: you don’t get paid very well, your salary may not include health care benefits, you might not receive parental leave or have access to your employer’s child care options, you probably don’t get to contribute to a retirement plan, and your employer might not bestow you with the level of consideration or respect that seems appropriate for your highly trained position. The longer one stays in a postdoc position, however, the greater chance that these negative aspects will compound.  

If you are a postdoc, it is good to know that there are organizations out there that are working toward improving your status, treatment, and prospects.  One such organization, of which I recently joined the executive board, is the University of Toronto Postdoctoral Association (UTPDA). The UTPDA serves postdocs at the University of Toronto and at affiliated research hospitals by advocating on their behalf, creating social networks, and promoting opportunities for career development.  

In my blog postings, I plan to talk about many of the issues confronting postdocs today (without being too “woe is me”) and to point out what the UTPDA and other support organizations are doing to address those issues. As a reader, you are always invited to leave comments below, with the hope that we can generate some valuable discussion. 

COMMENTS:


In order to proceed, please enter the code shown:
your email:
your name:
COMMENTS:


Your e-mail is required, but will not be made public and will not be sold to any third party.
Comments should promote a civil exchange of viewpoints, ideas and criticisms. Comments will not be moderated prior to appearing on the website, however Academic Matters reserves the right to remove posts that are:
Profane, lewd, hateful or otherwise offensive; defamatory or otherwise engaged in personal attacks; or unrelated to the content of the post.
Thank you for your cooperation in maintaining an open and engaging exchange of ideas on this website.
Recent Posts
Postdocs: Who are we? - 2/24/2010 by Katherine Akers
Postdocs: Where are we? - 1/31/2010 by Katherine Akers
Two Minds - 3/7/2009 by MK
Stepping In - 2/7/2009 by MK
Deck the Halls - 12/17/2008 by MK
“Holiday” Outs... - 11/25/2008 by MK
The view from here - 11/7/2008 by MK
About MK
MK is a sessional instructor at a Canadian university.
 
About Katherine Akers
Katherine Akers is a postdoctoral research fellow in Neurosciences and Mental Health at the Hospital for Sick Children and the Officer of External Relations for the University of Toronto Postdoctoral Association. She received her PhD in Psychology from the University of New Mexico.