Current Issue
Current Issue Cover
Challenging the Academy
May 2010
Content of Current Issue
Class Warriors
William Ayers
Professor William Ayers, banned last year from speaking at the University of Nebraska, argues that the current trend towards “academic capitalism” gives faculty the moment to speak up – and act up. MORE>
Higher Education or Education for Hire? Corporatization and the Threat to Democratic Thinking
Joel Westheimer
Teaching critical thinking is the university’s democratic mission, argues the University of Ottawa’s Joel Westheimer, and today’s universities are failing to deliver. Universities need to reverse the trend that has them focusing on workforce preparation and the commercialization of knowledge and resurrect higher education’s public purpose.  MORE>
The University: Punctuated by Paradox
Simon Marginson
Old/new, engaged/separate, public/private, elite/mass-oriented, national/global. But for universities, Simon Marginson argues, paradox is vital.  MORE>
The Queer Agenda on Campus: Invisible? Stalled? Incomplete?
David Rayside
For universities to become truly inclusive, sexual orientation and gender identity have to be fully incorporated into the employment equity agenda, argues the University of Toronto’s David Rayside. MORE>
Acting Out of Character in the Immortal Profession: Toward a Free Trait Agreement
Brian R. Little
Sometimes, the academic life demands that faculty deny their fundamental personality traits. But if collegial respect includes allowing colleagues the latitude to nurture their true characters, academics can survive and thrive amidst the challenges of academic life. MORE>
An Academic Life: Peter Dale Scott
David MacGregor
 MORE>
Humour Matters – Sabbatical Time
Steve Penfold
In an odd and unpredictable way, the Olympics saved my first sabbatical. I mean, I had great plans for my first sabbatical. No lectures to churn out, no essays to mark, no exams to set, no emails to return – just time to think, read, and write. But it wasn’t going to be all work. No sir. I figured it would be long lunches, real coffee breaks (you know, where you actually take a break!), walks in the afternoon, and even the occasional nap. Sabbatical would be like an adult version of daycare and, if anything went wrong, I could just go to the quiet area for a time out. MORE>
Editorial Matters – The road ahead
Mark Rosenfeld
A university cancels a public lecture by an outspoken academic due to political pressure. A job offer at a prestigious research institute is rescinded in response to the opposition of a large, corporate sponsor. Police arrest demonstrators at a debate on one the flashpoints of regional geo-politics. A decision with far-reaching academic implications is taken with only perfunctory reference to collegial governance. A university’s strategic plan uses the corporate sector as a model, with the aim of maximizing growth, marketability and profit. MORE>
 October/November 2009 issue
Debating Tenure
October/November 2009
issue of Academic Matters
   

emailEmail this article PrintPrint this commentPost a Comment (0) Comments Share/Save/Bookmark

Humour Matters

Humour Matters_pic

Tenure and the Frights of Passage

by Steve Penfold

I always thought I was good at dealing with gatekeepers. After all, my parents lived in a border town for 15 years, so anything the family needed—books, gas, cigarettes, shoes—we got across the line. In fact, “going shopping” was pretty much a synonym for “crossing the border,” and “America” was just another way of saying “shopping mall.” And we never paid duty on anything, thanks to my father’s Jedi-like ability to befuddle border guards by answering questions with non sequiturs like “I just put in the toast” or “I had a Coke at Denny’s.” Another strategy was appealing to the gatekeepers’ salt-of-the-earth masculinity, a good tactic in the days before affirmative action. This generally involved adding a six-pack of Budweiser to any purchase (beer and groceries, beer and shoes, beer and books, beer and eyeglasses…) while liberally deploying the word “the” in front of “wife.”

But even my father would have been defeated by the year-long gate-keeping ritual we call tenure. From assembling my file to receiving that coveted letter, I was a nervous wreck, notwithstanding the fact that my colleagues were awesomely supportive and my university’s process transparent and fair. Linguists report that assistant professors have 65 words for not getting tenure, and I can see why.

Nothing seemed to help. The more orientation sessions I attended, the less oriented I became. The more people told me, “There are no stupid questions,” the more I became convinced they really meant that my questions were stupid. The more I organized my file, the more I thought I was forgetting something. “You fool,” I imagined some future letter reading, “tenure would have been granted if only you had included a copy of Assignment Two in HIS263 from Fall 2004.” Damn! Where did I put that copy!?!

And how can anyone with a trace of humility write a Research Statement? Every second sentence of my first draft was “stupid, stupid, stupid,” which I can’t imagine goes over well with international referees. And who are these people with “Teaching Philosophies”? When I’m in front of a classroom, filling 50 minutes without drooling is pretty much my primary goal, and anything north of full-out humiliation is pure gravy.

And oh, the seductive charms of tenure lore! It doesn’t take much more than a few in-the-hallway sessions with your colleagues—whose multiple boxes of colour-coded files, tabs affixed, seem to undergo mitosis before your eyes—to move from nervousness to absolute despair. “Just go with the flow,” a friendly senior colleague suggested—forgetting that, by definition, things flow down hill. “There is a light at the end of the tunnel,” my faculty mentor reminded me. Fine words, until I passed this bit of alleyway graffiti the very next day: “The light at the end of the tunnel has gone out.” Even this seemed an optimistic take on things after six months of waiting.

The more I worried, the crazier my delusions became. At one point, I began to suspect that my PhD alma mater would realize that my B-level undergraduate marks actually disqualified me from graduate school. It got worse: since I have the good fortune of teaching in the department where I got my BA, I became convinced that some member of my tenure committee would realize I still owed them an essay from 1988. “Right! Out with him then!” (Not to mention that very supportive Full Professor who may not remember that I got a 42 on his mid-term exam).

Well, you don’t need to google “impostor syndrome” to see where this is going. Tenure is serious business and, unless you’re my dad, dealing with gatekeepers is nerve-wracking and stressful. But perk up. Even if non sequiturs won’t work, you can always set your word processor to replace adjectives like “stupid” and “incoherent” with phrases like “prestigious international journal” and “flexible pedagogic strategy.” In the end, even I entered into a common law relationship with my university. And now for that six-pack of Budweiser…

Steve Penfold is Academic Matters’ humour columnist. He moonlights as an associate professor of history at the University of Toronto.

COMMENTS:


In order to proceed, please enter the code shown:
your email:
your name:
COMMENTS:


Your e-mail is required, but will not be made public and will not be sold to any third party.
Comments should promote a civil exchange of viewpoints, ideas and criticisms. Comments will not be moderated prior to appearing on the website, however Academic Matters reserves the right to remove posts that are:
Profane, lewd, hateful or otherwise offensive; defamatory or otherwise engaged in personal attacks; or unrelated to the content of the post.
Thank you for your cooperation in maintaining an open and engaging exchange of ideas on this website.